One day I was walking to work after another lost weekend. I’d blown all my wages, I’d lost my phone again, and I had no idea how I was going to get through the month with nothing in my bank account.
I felt wretched.
Then a small, bleak comfort popped into my head. At least being this broke meant I probably couldn’t drink for the rest of the month. And underneath that thought came a stranger one. Right now, on this pavement, there was no pull towards drink, no urge to use drugs, not even a craving for a cigarette.
I felt free at last. Standing there in the misery, I was completely clean and sober.
So why couldn’t I hold on to this? Why not stretch the moment out and stay this way for good?
Because I already knew the answer. In a few weeks the money would return, and so would the drunk, reaching for the bottle and boarding the same train to hell I’d ridden a hundred times before.
Which left me with a question I couldn’t shake.
The man on the pavement wanted nothing to do with drink. The man a few weeks from now would want nothing else. Both of them were ‘me’. Both felt completely like me when it was their turn to speak.
So which one was I?
So which one were you?
Neither.
That is the answer non-duality offers, and it took me years to understand it.
The sober man on the pavement was a passing state. The drinking man a few weeks later was another. They contradicted each other completely, yet each one, while it lasted, felt like the whole of me. That is the trick. Whichever mood is speaking sounds like your own voice.
The states are real enough as experiences, but they are not who you are. They appear and they dissolve. Something has to remain to notice that they came and went, and that something cannot be any one of them.
You are not the sober self. You are not the addict self. You are what both of them appear in.
The case of mistaken identity
Addiction, seen this way, is not a problem to do with any substance. It is a problem of identity.
Advaita has a precise word for it. Adhyasa, superimposition. A craving arises in awareness, and we act on it because we take the craving to be ours.
Shankara, who systematised the Advaita tradition, illustrated the error with the image of a rope seen at dusk and mistaken for a snake. The fear it triggers is real. The racing heart is real. But there is no snake, only the appearance of one. There was only ever rope. And in the same way, there was only ever awareness. The craving is real, but the self it seems to belong to is the snake laid over the rope.
This is the mistake beneath addiction. A craving arises and, fused with the mind, we conclude I want this. It passes, a sober resolve takes its place, and we conclude I am better now. Same error, opposite content. Each time, we identify with an object moving through awareness rather than with the awareness it moves through.
Here is why this matters in recovery. As long as you believe you are the mind, every craving feels like it is about you. As long as you believe you are the sober self, every relapse is proof that you have failed. Both selves keep you fighting on the battlefield, because both take the battlefield to be you.
And while the fight stays on that ground, no substance can end it. Mistake yourself for the mind and you take on its restlessness, the nagging sense that something is missing. The reaching is real, but it is pointed the wrong way. What you are looking for is not a thing to be found, so nothing you find can hold it, and the relief always fades.
Who was watching the two of you?
In the end, there was only one presence on that pavement. Not the drunk, and not the one wishing for sobriety, but the one aware of both.
It saw there was no craving in that moment, and it could already see the relapse arriving weeks ahead. Something was watching the whole scene without being caught in any part of it.
Advaita calls this the sakshi, the witness. Pure awareness, the silent seer in which every state appears. It is not a better version of you assembled in recovery. It was there in the child, in the drinker, in the man on his way to work. It does not crave and it does not resolve to quit. It only sees.
The Bhagavad Gita points to the same distinction in its thirteenth chapter, where Krishna separates the field from the knower of the field. The field is everything that can be observed: the body, the mind, the wages, the misery, the craving, the sober self, the drinking self. The knower is the awareness all of it appears to. You have spent your life believing you were something in the field. You are the one who knows the field.
The freedom I reached for was the wrong one
When I wanted to stretch that craving-free moment out forever, I was reaching for the wrong freedom.
I assumed the freedom lived in the moment’s content. No craving, therefore peace. So I wanted to freeze the content and stay there. But that freedom was conditional. It depended on the craving keeping its distance, and it never does. The wages return, the mind stirs, and the calm collapses. Reaching to preserve a pleasant state is just one more movement of the mind that causes the trouble.
The real freedom was never in the absence of craving. It was in the noticing itself. The awareness doing the watching was already free, and it would have stayed free with the craving present too. I didn’t need to extend anything. I needed to recognise where I was standing.
This is the practical hinge of the whole thing, and it is why watching a craving weakens it rather than feeding it. When attention settles back as the witness, the craving is simply seen instead of believed. And a craving cannot keep its grip once it is watched rather than obeyed. You are no longer the drinking self trying to overpower the sober self. You have stepped off the battlefield entirely.
It changes what relapse is, too. The return to the bottle weeks later was never a sudden moral collapse. It was a lapse of recognition, a slide back into being run by the mind, which is why relapse isn’t the problem, unconsciousness is. The drink was only the last link in the chain. The first was forgetting who was watching.
What was never mistaken
Both men on that walk have long since passed. The misery passed. The money troubles passed. The drinking self, in time, passed too.
What remained is the one who watched them go.
You are not the addict, and you are not the one trying to cure the addict. There was never a broken self to fix, only a spiritual thirst no substance could quench. Both are appearances in consciousness, and neither of them is you. The one reading this now, quietly aware behind these words, is who you have always been.
Leave a Reply